[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
On Sun, 2002-01-13 at 14:46, Andrew Morton wrote:

> I can't say that I have ever seen any significant change in throughput
> of anything with any of this stuff.

I can send you some numbers. It is typically 5-10% throughput increase
under load. Obviously this work won't help a single task on a single
user system. But things like (ack!) dbench 16 show a marked

> Benchmarks are well and good, but until we have a solid explanation for
> the throughput changes which people are seeing, it's risky to claim
> that there is a general benefit.

I have an explanation. We can schedule quicker off a woken task. When
an event occurs that allows an I/O-blocked task to run, its time-to-run
is shorter. Same event/response improvement that helps interactivity.

Robert Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.617 / U:1.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site