Messages in this thread | | | From | Dieter Nützel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] update: preemptive kernel for O(1) sched | Date | Mon, 14 Jan 2002 01:07:52 +0100 |
| |
On Monday, 14. January 2002 00:48, you wrote: > On Sun, 2002-01-13 at 18:22, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > what about lock-break? > > I am running your former one as always with > > lock-break-rml-2.4.18-pre1-1.patch ...;-) > > I haven't tested O(1) together with lock-break personally, yet, but I > have a confirmation of success from a couple of users. There are no > reasons it shouldn't work.
I'll say that I am running this altogether. Only vm-22 or rmap-11 are missing for now. 2.4.17 was running for me with vm-21 and preempt+look-beak.
> > Any success together with AA vm-22? > > Again I don't have any personal tests. I do know, however, the Rik's > rmap VM works great.
AA, too . Best throughput I've ever seen.
> I suspect Andrea's updated VM from -aa will work, but there may be other > parts of his patch (RCU) that are not preempt friendly.
But I've only used the VM parts not RCU, etc.
> > What about latencytest0.42-png for latency testing? > > A good test.
Expect some numbers (latency) for O(1) with and without preempt+lock-break maybe with AA-VM, soon.
-Dieter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |