[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 1-2-3 GB
On 13 Jan 2002, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> By the way, expect user programs to fail due to lack of address space
> if you only give them 1 GB of userspace. At 1 GB of userspace there
> is *no* address space which is compatible with the normal address
> space map available to the user process.
> I would personally vote against including that particular option.

It could be useful for machines where most activity happens
inside the kernel, though. Think of TUX web or ftp servers
or dedicated NFS servers.


"Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
-- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.096 / U:1.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site