[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] klibc requirements, round 2

On 12 Jan 2002, Juan Quintela wrote:

> >>>>> "greg" == Greg KH <> writes:
> Hi
> greg> To summarize, here's a partial list of the programs people want to run:
> greg> - mount

I _really_ doubt it. /init calling mount(2) - sure, but mount(8)?
Not really.

> greg> - hotplug
> greg> - busybox
> greg> - dhcpcd
> greg> - image viewer
> greg> - mkreiserfs
> greg> - partition discovery (currently in the kernel)

Assuming that it moves to userland, which is non-obvious. Going other
way (i.e. clean kernel API for parsing _and_ changing partitioning)
might be better. Current mechanisms for notifying kernel about partition
table changes are really gross.

> greg> - lots of other, existing in kernel code.

nfsroot mounting (socket/sendto/recvfrom/open/close/read/write/malloc/free/

> I still think that fsck at this point will be great. You will
> minimize the need to have the kernel special case for fsck the root fs
> with respect to the rest of fs.

_Kernel_ has no special-casing of that kind.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.129 / U:1.144 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site