Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:21:41 +0100 (CET) | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: initramfs programs (was [RFC] klibc requirements) |
| |
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> > We have also been over the fact that dmidecode, if written > > appropriately, could be setuid, or call a "dmicat" setuid program. > > This is a dmidecode implementation detail. > We've also proved the DMI data is too unreliable to be used, so the entire > problem space is irrelevant
That's not a problem, remember Eric volunteered to maintain the enormous black list 8-)
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |