[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: initramfs programs (was [RFC] klibc requirements)
    Dave Jones wrote:

    > On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
    >>We've also proved the DMI data is too unreliable to be used, so the entire
    >>problem space is irrelevant
    > That's not a problem, remember Eric volunteered to maintain the
    > enormous black list 8-)

    Surelly I will not maintain the DMI table!
    It is already difficult to maintain the database of CPU.
    The newer CPUs have name stored directly in CPU and no more
    in kernel :-(

    This is a call for help: how to write a table
    Now I use Vendor/Name/Family/Stepping/, but
    maybe with Vendor + flags (CPUID flags) the result
    will be more correct?

    Other suggestions?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.021 / U:17.292 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site