[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: initramfs programs (was [RFC] klibc requirements)
Alan Cox wrote:

>>Surelly I will not maintain the DMI table!
> Quite
>>This is a call for help: how to write a table
>>Now I use Vendor/Name/Family/Stepping/, but
>>maybe with Vendor + flags (CPUID flags) the result
>>will be more correct?
> You need the family/model information to get the right optimisations. Its
> often not that the instruction set is different but that the cpu
> implementation is different that determines the choice. With a couple of
> exceptions cpu type is actually not too important and accidentally using
> 486 will make little difference

Something I'd really like to see would be to split "optimize for..." and
"run on..." for CPU type; just like gcc has -mmach= and -march=.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.085 / U:5.172 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site