[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: initramfs programs (was [RFC] klibc requirements)
    Alan Cox wrote:

    >>Surelly I will not maintain the DMI table!
    > Quite
    >>This is a call for help: how to write a table
    >>Now I use Vendor/Name/Family/Stepping/, but
    >>maybe with Vendor + flags (CPUID flags) the result
    >>will be more correct?
    > You need the family/model information to get the right optimisations. Its
    > often not that the instruction set is different but that the cpu
    > implementation is different that determines the choice. With a couple of
    > exceptions cpu type is actually not too important and accidentally using
    > 486 will make little difference

    Something I'd really like to see would be to split "optimize for..." and
    "run on..." for CPU type; just like gcc has -mmach= and -march=.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.048 / U:0.604 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site