[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Purpose of the mm/slab.c changes

On 09-Sep-2001 Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote:
>> > it provides lifo allocations from both partial and unused slabs.
>> lifo/fifo for unused slabs is obviously superflous - free is
>> free, it doesn't matter which free page is used first/last.
> Mind that the L2 cache is often as much as 10 times faster
> than RAM, so it would be nice if we had a good chance that
> the slab we just allocated would be in L2 cache.

Do You see it as a plus ?
The new allocated slab will be very likely written ( w/o regard about the old content )
and an L2 mapping will generate invalidate traffic.

- Davide

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.122 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site