Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 09 Sep 2001 22:20:34 -0400 | From | Chris Mason <> | Subject | Re: linux-2.4.10-pre5 |
| |
On Monday, September 10, 2001 04:22:25 AM +0200 Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net> wrote:
> On September 10, 2001 04:15 am, Daniel Phillips wrote: >> On September 10, 2001 03:55 am, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: >> > getblk should unconditionally alloc a new bh entity and only care to >> > map it to the right cache backing store with a pagecache hash lookup. >> >> To feel anything like the original the new getblk has to be idempotent: >> subsequent calls return the same block. > > Err, buffer_head
How about subsequent calls for the same offset with the same blocksize need to return the same buffer head?
-chris
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |