Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Feedback on preemptible kernel patch | From | Robert Love <> | Date | 09 Sep 2001 17:37:53 -0400 |
| |
On Sun, 2001-09-09 at 17:23, Arjan Filius wrote: > After my succes report i _do_ noticed something unusual: > > I'm not sure it's preempt related, but you wanted feedback :) > > Sep 9 23:08:02 sjoerd kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x70/1). > Sep 9 23:08:02 sjoerd last message repeated 93 times > Sep 9 23:08:02 sjoerd kernel: cation failed (gfp=0x70/1). > Sep 9 23:08:02 sjoerd kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x70/1). > Sep 9 23:08:02 sjoerd last message repeated 281 times > > This is at the very moment i make a ppp connection to internet, and > get/set the time with netdate (for the first time after a reboot). > I didn't see this a second time (yet). >
damn, I was exciting we had solved everything :)
actually, I am not confident of what could cause these results. the 2.4.10-pre is going through another set of changes it should not, and one of them concerns exactly what you are reporting.
SO, I suggest two options: try pre6. I don't have patches yet, but I will diff them soon. pre5 should apply fairly cleanly, anyhow.
Even better, try 2.4.9-ac10. It is what I use, and there seems to be less reported problems. Plus, Alan is not messing with all the VM work Linus is playing with right now. Patches for 2.4.9-ac10 are available.
Both can be had at: http://tech9.net/rml/linux/
I am curious if you see the error again, and what seems to cause it, but honestly there is too much work being done in 2.4.10-pre to figure things out.
Nevertheless, I will look into it -- keep me posted.
-- Robert M. Love rml at ufl.edu rml at tech9.net
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |