Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: "Cached" grows and grows and grows... | Date | Sat, 8 Sep 2001 18:14:46 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> // printk(KERN_ERR "__alloc_pages: %lu-order allocation failed.\n", order) > return NULL; > > If there is no printk, you will obviously not notice the problem. You can bet > your car on not "seeing the problem".
That printk is commented out because its pointless and bogus noise. It just causes confused bug reporting. The stuff that matters is cache sizes shrinking back when we need memory not slowly eating the computer alive.
> Nevertheless there _is_ a problem, because nfs still fails on low mem situation > when option "no_subtree_check" is _off_/not used.
In certain cases NFS will struggle. It isnt as bad in -ac as we use GFP_KERNEL for nfs level reassembly. It happens in 2.2 as well tho.
Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |