lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 19:51:26 +0200 Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
wrote:

> On September 6, 2001 03:10 pm, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> > [...]
> > to lots on the nfs-data. Even if the nfs-data would only have one single
hit,
> > the old CD image should have been removed, because it is inactive and
_older_.
>
> OK, this is not related to what we were discussing (IO latency). It's not
too
> hard to fix, we just need to do a little aging whenever there are
allocations,
> whether or not there is memory_pressure. I don't think it's a real problem
> though, we have at least two problems we really do need to fix (oom and
> high order failures).

Hm, I am not quite sure about that. Can you _show_ me how to fix this?

Regards,
Stephan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02    [W:0.164 / U:1.568 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site