Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 7 Sep 2001 14:30:21 +0200 | From | Stephan von Krawczynski <> | Subject | Re: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue |
| |
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 19:51:26 +0200 Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net> wrote:
> On September 6, 2001 03:10 pm, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > [...] > > to lots on the nfs-data. Even if the nfs-data would only have one single hit, > > the old CD image should have been removed, because it is inactive and _older_. > > OK, this is not related to what we were discussing (IO latency). It's not too > hard to fix, we just need to do a little aging whenever there are allocations, > whether or not there is memory_pressure. I don't think it's a real problem > though, we have at least two problems we really do need to fix (oom and > high order failures).
Hm, I am not quite sure about that. Can you _show_ me how to fix this?
Regards, Stephan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |