Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Michael Rothwell" <> | Subject | Re: nfs is stupid ("getfh failed") | Date | Fri, 7 Sep 2001 08:58:18 -0400 |
| |
From: "Neil Brown" <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
> This is not allowed, and makes no sense.
It apparently is (or was, anyway) allowed, because it worked until the server was rebooted. Fluke? Are you saying that, if I export "/export", I can mount "/export/home" from a client machine? That's nice.
> Simply remove the second line and your problems should go away.
Thanks. I actually switched to two explicit exports; /export/files and /export/home, which works.
> > On a related topic, will Linux ever have a better file-service protocol? > > This is an unanswerable question. The future of Linux is completely > undefined until it happens.
Just wondering if there's been any talk, plans, etc. of an alternative for NFS.
> What exactly do you mean by "better" anyway?
Better security, better performance.
Thanks,
-M
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |