[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: notion of a local address [was: Re: ioctl SIOCGIFNETMASK: ip aliasbug 2.4.9 and 2.2.19]
Andrey Savochkin wrote:
> It will work almost always, except cases where administrator set different
> preffered sources in local routes.
> I.e. it is indeed a very good approximation, but autofs shouldn't still hang
> or do nasty things if the check with the datagram socket shows that address
> isn't local, but in reality it happens to be local.
> A subtle misbehavior or loss of efficiency are acceptable, in my opinion.
> Theoretically, it might be possible to create a configuration which gives
> false positive in this check, but I can't see how it may be harmful...

If the check gives a false negative, autofs will create an NFS mount
even though it's a local file (which may fail if the filesystem isn't
exported, and is definitely slower.)

If the check gives a false positive, it will try a local bind (and
probably fail) even though it is a remote filesystem.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02    [W:0.069 / U:2.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site