Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 7 Sep 2001 18:26:21 +0200 (EET) | From | Nerijus Baliunas <> | Subject | Re: Basic reiserfs question |
| |
On Fri, 07 Sep 2001 11:50:06 +0400 Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> wrote:
HR> I only have secondhand reports from users who patch RedHat boot scripts as HR> described at the end of www.namesys.com/faq.html, so your statement leaves me HR> puzzled as to whether the secondhand reports were from persons who didn't HR> understand the boot scripts. Comments are welcome.
Hello,
I took time to read FAQ, and here are few comments.
1 - I understand you don't like RedHat, but instead of ranting, you could just say that gcc-2.96 from RH updates or RH 7.1 is OK (Alan Cox even recommends it for compiling recent 2.4 kernels).
16 - also "df -i" shows that there are no used inodes on reiserfs partitions.
36 - Can I use /sbin/badblocks -b <reiserfs-block-size> on existing reiserfs partition?
39 - a link to "I'm not using RedHat's special release of a buggy compiler" (http://www.namesys.com/gcc-2.96) is not found.
40 - spelling error "ResierFS".
41 - there is nothing about how to solve it.
Regards, Nerijus
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |