lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue
Date
On September 6, 2001 06:57 pm, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> > Err, not quite the whole story. It is *never* right to leave the disk
> > sitting idle while there are dirty, writable IO buffers.
>
> Define "idle" ?

Idle = not doing anything. IO queue is empty.

> Is idle the time it takes between two readahead requests
> to be issued, delaying the second request because you
> just moved the disk arm away ?

Which two readahead requests? It's idle.

> Is idle when we haven't had a request for, say, 3 disk
> seek time periods ?

See above definition of idle.

> Is idle when we won't be getting any request soon for the
> area where the disk arm is hanging out ? (and how do we
> know the future?)

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02    [W:0.076 / U:7.216 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site