Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 6 Sep 2001 17:10:49 +0200 | From | Stephan von Krawczynski <> | Subject | Re: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue |
| |
On Thu, 06 Sep 2001 16:02:04 +0100 Alex Bligh - linux-kernel <linux-kernel@alex.org.uk> wrote:
> Stephan, > >> You yourself proved this, by switching rsize,wsize to 1k and said > >> it all worked fine! (unless I misread your email). > > > > Sorry, misunderstanding: I did not touch rsize/wsize. What I do is to lower fs > > action by not letting knfsd walk through the subtrees of a mounted fs. This > > leads to less allocs/frees by the fs layer which tend to fail and let knfs fail > > afterwards. > > OK, I'm getting confused.
To end that:
What I meant was, I did not touch the values most everybody uses on NFS, which is: rsize=8192,wsize=8192 Using smaller values (or default = 1024) gives such a ridicolously bad performance that I would even prefer samba.
Regards, Stephan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |