[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On September 6, 2001 01:52 pm, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Jan Harkes wrote:
> >
> > > To get back on the thread I jumped into, I totally agree with Linus
> > > that writeout should be as soon as possible.
> >
> > Nice way to destroy read performance.
> Blindly delaying all the writes in the name of better read performance
> isn't the right idea either. Perhaps we should have a good think
> about some sensible mechanism for balancing reads against writes.

Absolutely, delaying writes for too long is just as bad,
we need something in-between.

> > Lets face it, spinning the washing machine is expensive
> > and running less than a full load makes things inefficient ;)
> That makes a good sound bite but doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
> It's not a washing machine ;-)

Two words: "IO clustering".


IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

Send all your spam to (spam digging piggy)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.110 / U:0.628 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site