lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue
    On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 03:18:27PM +0200, Kurt Garloff wrote:
    > On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 10:03:03AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
    > > On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > > > On September 6, 2001 02:32 pm, Rik van Riel wrote:
    > > > > Two words: "IO clustering".
    > > >
    > > > Yes, *after* the IO queue is fully loaded that makes sense. Leaving it
    > > > partly or fully idle while waiting for it to load up makes no sense at all.
    > > >
    > > > IO clustering will happen naturally after the queue loads up.
    > >
    > > Exactly, so we need to give the queue some time to load
    > > up, right ?
    >
    > Just use two limits:
    > * Time: After some time (say two seconds), we can always afford to write it
    > out
    > * Queue filling: After it has a certain size, it's worth doing a writing.
    >

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't these two settings tunable in bdflush?
    If not, then how exactly does bdflush interact with this?
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.023 / U:92.500 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site