[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> > Just use two limits:
> > * Time: After some time (say two seconds), we can always afford to write it
> > out=20
> > * Queue filling: After it has a certain size, it's worth doing a writing.
> Both debatable and both I can find counter cases for - think about a
> shared memory database with multiple game clients using it (eg the
> older AberMUD codebase). Writing that to disk is counterproductive

This is only for pages on the inactive_dirty list, though;
ie pages we want to evict from memory with the minimal amount
of work possible ;)


IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

Send all your spam to (spam digging piggy)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.136 / U:3.368 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site