lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: io_request_lock/queue_lock patch
On Wed, Sep 05 2001, Peter Rival wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >You are now browsing the request list without agreeing on what lock is
> >being held -- what happens to drivers assuming that io_request_lock
> >protects the list? Boom. For 2.4 we simply cannot afford to muck around
> >with this, it's jsut too dangerous. For 2.5 I already completely removed
> >the io_request_lock (also helps to catch references to it from drivers).
>
> Is this part of the bio patches? (I confess, I haven't had the time to
> look yet.) If not, do you know when we'll be seeing sneak previews of
> this code? (Yes, it's me again! ;)

Yep it's part of the bio patch. bio-14 for 2.4.10-preX is pending today
or tomorrow.

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.141 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site