Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 6 Sep 2001 08:18:40 -0300 (BRST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue |
| |
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:54:27PM -0400, Jan Harkes wrote: > > Now for the past _9_ stable kernel releases, page aging hasn't worked > > at all!! Nobody seems to even have bothered to check. I send in a patch > > All I can say is that I hope you will get your problem fixed with one > of the next -aa, I incidentally started working on it yesterday.
You too? ;)
> So far it's a one thousand diff very far from compiling, so it will > grow further, but it shouldn't take too long to finish the rewrite. > Once finished the benchmarks and the reproducible 2.4 deadlocks will > tell me if I'm right.
Of course, we could try to work together on this one, since we both seem to be starved for time ...
cheers,
Rik -- IA64: a worthy successor to i860.
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |