Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 06 Sep 2001 18:32:13 +0100 | From | Alex Bligh - linux-kernel <> | Subject | Re: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue |
| |
--On Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:34 PM +0200 Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net> wrote:
> On September 6, 2001 05:18 pm, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel wrote: >> --On Thursday, September 06, 2001 5:10 PM +0200 Stephan von Krawczynski >> <skraw@ithnet.com> wrote: >> >> > (or default = 1024) gives such a ridicolously bad >> > performance >> >> I know. I am trying to ensure we have the problem definitively >> identified, either from /proc/memareas, or by showing it >> goes away if you change rsize/wsize. I am NOT proposing >> it as a fix. > > Are rsize/wsize expressed in bytes? In which case you'd want them to be > 4096 for this test.
Bytes per request. There is some header wastage, so 4096 is too high as the packets will be slightly larger than a page. I suggested 1024 rather than 2048 as 1024 is the original standard & thus everything supports it.
-- Alex Bligh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |