Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 05 Sep 2001 14:14:09 +0100 | From | Alex Bligh - linux-kernel <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4.9-ac6 |
| |
> Would it not be possible with your scheme to package a closed source > driver in an open source wrapper driver and then defeat your tainting > technique.
It would also be theoretically possible for an evil driver merchant to twiddle the flag back via /dev/kmem (for instance). Or load the module by manipulation of /dev/kmem. Or for the bug-reporting user to patch their kernel so that the flag never got set and hence disguise the presence of an nvidia driver (etc.) in a misguided attempt to wangle support out of Alan et al.
However, I understood the point of the exercize to be a first pass hueristic to flag bug reports from systems running modules for which Alan and others haven't got, and can't get the source. It's not going to be perfect (see above), but equally doesn't need to be. I'm sure users do all sorts of other 'well don't do that, then' stuff which wastes the time of those reading bug reports.
-- Alex Bligh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |