Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 05 Sep 2001 10:50:14 +0100 | From | Alex Bligh - linux-kernel <> | Subject | RE: Linux 2.4.9-ac6 |
| |
>> I think, perhaps, the logic should be that a module >> shouldn't taint the kernel if: >> >> 1) The user built the module from source on that machine, OR >> >> 2) The module source is freely available without restriction > > I just realized two things. One, there's a strong argument that this > should be an AND, not an OR.
And as all distributions would fail (1) in initial form, all distributions would result in tainted kernels. Is this the intent?
-- Alex Bligh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |