lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRE: Linux 2.4.9-ac6
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, David Schwartz wrote:

<snip>

So basically this is all obvious. Nobody's going to help someone with a
million-dollar GPL module if they don't provide the code. People will
help others with non-GPL modules if they are interested in helping, can
legally get the code, and can legally distribute patches. Nobody's going
to be an idiot and stick rigidly by a tainting scheme when someone
obviously has an open-source module that's not GPL, and needs help.
That's all I was trying to say. I don't think everyone's going to
ignore tainted bug reports universally, and there's nothing requiring that
to happen. It makes sense to read a bit more into a bug report anyway;
Ignoring filesystem corruption because the bug report was tainted by an
nvidia driver or a 3rd-party serial driver isn't going to help anyone.

That's all in the interpretation of the tainted report, not the fact that
it's tainted. There's also reporter-end probably-undebuggable report
elimination. If two people a year don't report "X Crashed ... and I use
nvdriver", that's a reason to have a taint flag, even if everyone ignored
the flag, even if it was set, in bug reports that were posted, right?


justin

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.098 / U:1.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site