Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Petr Vandrovec" <> | Date | Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:17:36 MET-1 | Subject | Re: [IDEA+RFC] Possible solution for min()/max() war |
| |
On 4 Sep 01 at 12:09, VDA wrote: > min2 performs a very strict checking. > min3 gives you full control, but checks for too small target type. > Do anybody see any flaws? Any improvements? > For compiler folks: Why GCC compiles ...f(1);f(1);f(1)... to > ... > pushl $1 > call f > addl $32,%esp <-- My grandma optimizes better > addl $-12,%esp <-- ? > pushl $1 > call f > addl $16,%esp <-- ? > addl $-12,%esp <-- ?
Compile with 'gcc -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2', gcc generates unbelievable stupid code for other values. Best regards, Petr Vandrovec vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |