Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 4 Sep 2001 06:15:17 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: [RFD] readonly/read-write semantics |
| |
On 4 Sep 2001, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On mar, 2001-09-04 at 06:09, Alexander Viro wrote: > > > Read-only is more complex - in addition to mount side ("does anyone want > > it to be r/w") there is a filesystem side ("does fs agree to be r/w")... > > How about, say, a reiserfs mounted r/o on a shared partition (loopback > over nfs) ? If it contains errors, maybe 2 "clients" will attempt to > rollback at the same time. Is the solution to never mount, even r/o, > remote journalling fs ?
??? Rollback is purely local thing, so NFS client doesn't matter at all. And nfsd is just an application running on server, whether it's a kernel thread or a normal process.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |