[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFD] readonly/read-write semantics

>> 1) I want to see files open for write have nothing to do with it. Unix
>> open/close is not a transaction, it's just a connection. Some
>> manage to use open/close as a transaction, but we're seeing less and
>> of that as more sophisticated facilities for transactions become
>> How many times have we all been frustrated trying to remount read only
>> some log file that hasn't been written to for hours is open for write?
>> A file write is in progress when a write() system call hasn't returned,
>> when the file is open for write.
>Uh-oh... How about shared mappings?

It's always shared mappings, isn't it? :-)

Virtual memory access to the file is even easier, though. A write in
progress is an individual store to virtual memory. The only way you could
even see it is if a page fault is in progress. So the most you would need
to wait for in going into the hard "read only" state I defined is for any
page I/O to complete. And for the "no new writes" state, you just write
protect all the pages (and any new ones that fault in too).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.038 / U:2.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site