lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue
Date
On September 4, 2001 09:54 pm, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:54:27PM -0400, Jan Harkes wrote:
> > Now for the past _9_ stable kernel releases, page aging hasn't worked
> > at all!! Nobody seems to even have bothered to check. I send in a patch
>
> All I can say is that I hope you will get your problem fixed with one of
> the next -aa, I incidentally started working on it yesterday. So far
> it's a one thousand diff very far from compiling, so it will grow
> further, but it shouldn't take too long to finish the rewrite. Once
> finished the benchmarks and the reproducible 2.4 deadlocks will tell me
> if I'm right.

Which reproducible deadlocks did you have in mind, and how do I reproduce
them?

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02    [W:0.145 / U:12.688 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site