Messages in this thread |  | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue | Date | Tue, 4 Sep 2001 22:10:42 +0200 |
| |
On September 4, 2001 09:54 pm, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:54:27PM -0400, Jan Harkes wrote: > > Now for the past _9_ stable kernel releases, page aging hasn't worked > > at all!! Nobody seems to even have bothered to check. I send in a patch > > All I can say is that I hope you will get your problem fixed with one of > the next -aa, I incidentally started working on it yesterday. So far > it's a one thousand diff very far from compiling, so it will grow > further, but it shouldn't take too long to finish the rewrite. Once > finished the benchmarks and the reproducible 2.4 deadlocks will tell me > if I'm right.
Which reproducible deadlocks did you have in mind, and how do I reproduce them?
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |