lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2 GB file limitation
    I would be interested to know on which processor your are seeing those
    results.
    In fact i do not have doubts that on somethuing like an alpha
    gcc 3.0.2 is faster.
    Maybe it could be faster also on PIV, I do not know. I never tried gcc
    3.0.2, i just used gcc 3.0.1 on Athlon systems, but I am
    going to gcc 3.0.2 snapshots as soon.

    Luigi


    On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, [iso-8859-2] Gábor Lénárt wrote:

    > On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:59:49AM -0400, safemode wrote:
    > > > Yes, gcc3 is (well at least NOW) a piece of shit. It produces BIGGER and
    > > > SLOWER binaries ... Checked on: Athlon, AMD K6-2.
    > > > With the same gcc command line ...
    > >
    > > gcc 3.0.2 produces lame binaries that are 45 seconds faster encoding
    > > 74minutes of audio than the gcc 2.95.4 binaries with the same cflags.
    > > gcc 2.95.4 produces a binary of 39432 bytes when gcc 3.0.2 with the same
    > > flags on the same source produces a binary of 37452 bytes. I then tested it
    > > with lame. gcc 2.95.4 produced a binary of 245664 bytes and 3.0.2 produced
    > > one of 238016 bytes. Same exact cflags and settings.
    > > So basically my testing absolutely contradicts your statement. So who is
    > > right?
    >

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:2.456 / U:0.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site