Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 30 Sep 2001 11:21:52 +0200 | From | Gábor Lénárt <> | Subject | Re: 2 GB file limitation |
| |
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:59:49AM -0400, safemode wrote: > > Yes, gcc3 is (well at least NOW) a piece of shit. It produces BIGGER and > > SLOWER binaries ... Checked on: Athlon, AMD K6-2. > > With the same gcc command line ... > > gcc 3.0.2 produces lame binaries that are 45 seconds faster encoding > 74minutes of audio than the gcc 2.95.4 binaries with the same cflags. > gcc 2.95.4 produces a binary of 39432 bytes when gcc 3.0.2 with the same > flags on the same source produces a binary of 37452 bytes. I then tested it > with lame. gcc 2.95.4 produced a binary of 245664 bytes and 3.0.2 produced > one of 238016 bytes. Same exact cflags and settings. > So basically my testing absolutely contradicts your statement. So who is > right?
Well, you may be right. I got my results with the first (pre?)release of gcc3. I'm going to try gcc 3.0.2 now ... Thanx for the correction.
-- --[ Gábor Lénárt ]---[ Vivendi Telecom Hungary ]---------[ lgb@lgb.hu ]-- U have 8 bit comp or chip of them and it's unused or to be sold? Call me! -------[ +36 30 2270823 ]------> LGB <-----[ Linux/UNIX/8bit 4ever ]----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |