Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:25:23 +0300 | From | Mika Liljeberg <> | Subject | Re: kernel changes |
| |
Pavel Zaitsev wrote: > Now I don't trust 2.4 line > kernel to work *at all*, so cautiously keep all old kernels in the /boot, > when upgrading.
Well, it's a good idea to always keep a few old kernels in /boot but I certainly identify with your point. I like to run the bleeding edge kernels at home but lately I've been having doubts. I've been looking for a stable kernel since 2.4.0-test9. While 2.4.0-test9 is not exactly bug free either, any later kernel either reboots at random (all later test versions and early 2.4.x versions) or locks up hard on my SMP machine. This does not appear to have anything to do with load, indeed it often happens with the machine completely idle. It can take hours or days before this occurs but sooner or later it does. Of course, nothing ever gets written to the logs. With 2.4.8 I almost thought I had hit paydirt, but no such luck. 2.4.9 crashed right off the bat. 2.4.10 seems more unstable than most. Enough so that I finally patched in ext3 and installed journals on my file systems just to give them a semblance of stability (and to speed up the random reboots).
That said, I might just have a hardware problem. However, something in the new kernels seems to touch it off. Any ideas and tools to track this down, besides intuition and brute force, would be appreciated. [Right now I'm running with swap disabled, on somebody's suggestion. Let's see what happens.]
Regards,
Mika Liljeberg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |