lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Binary only module overview
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 jmjones@jmjones.com wrote:

> However, the way I understand copyright laws (admittedly "vague"): it
> is up to the copyright holder to defend his product, not anybody else.
> If Linus, or anybody else, wants to say "okay, I won't file suit
> against people who abuse me in this manner ... XYZ", that's his/her
> right.

But could he decide that for the code of one of the other
few-hundred copyright holders in the kernel ?

Note that even if Linus says he thinks something is ok,
people would still need to respect the rights of all the
other copyright holders to the kernel.

Interesting thing is that Richard Stallman never seemed
willing to take this leap and trust the GPL, but instead
requires people to sign over their copyright to the FSF
before code is accepted into a GNU project ;))

cheers,

Rik
--
IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.088 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site