Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:26:21 -0400 | Subject | Re: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? | From | (bill davidsen) |
| |
In article <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109280049380.19147-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>, Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> wrote: | On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Thomas Hood wrote: | | > Either 2.4.9-ac16 has much improved VM performance over | > previous 2.4 kernels (under moderate load, at least), or someone | > sneaked in to my apartment last night and upgraded my machine | > while I was asleep. I'm leaning toward the latter explanation. | | Now that the -ac VM was stable for a few weeks, I thought | it might be time to sneak in some big performance changes, | finally. | | They seem to work ;)
I have been playing with 2.4.9-ac16 and I note that on a small machine (without the highmem issues) it really seems much slower initially. After startx I pop up netscape for a test, and it takes almost 50% longer than 2.4.8-pre3 I've been running since it was new. After that it seems okay but not wildly better, my aim was to be able to use netscape and cdrecord and {anything_else} at the same time.
I'm measuring some figures now, and I have to dig out the location of the preempt stuff and see if it's in already, or will slide in without breaking. My bookmarks are on backup while I use the 2nd drive for something else today :-(
-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> "If I were a diplomat, in the best case I'd go hungry. In the worst case, people would die." -- Robert Lipe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |