Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:36:33 -0300 (BRST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? |
| |
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, bill davidsen wrote:
> I have been playing with 2.4.9-ac16 and I note that on a small machine > (without the highmem issues) it really seems much slower initially. > After startx I pop up netscape for a test, and it takes almost 50% > longer than 2.4.8-pre3 I've been running since it was new. After that it > seems okay but not wildly better, my aim was to be able to use netscape > and cdrecord and {anything_else} at the same time.
Mmmm, interesting. Could you send me a screen worth of top output and maybe 10 or 20 lines or so of 'vmstat 1' output, both taken while the machine is going through a hard time ?
Lets try to resolve this issue while we're at it ;)
regards,
Rik -- IA64: a worthy successor to the i860.
http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |