Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:31:47 +0200 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10. |
| |
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 02:21:07PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > Then how would you explain the 10% speed difference > Ben and others have seen with gigabit ethernet ?
partly because of the unwakeup logic, I've no problem with it, this is why I asked to measure how much of the 10% improvement cames from the unwakeup/ksoftirqd-deschedule logic, I was just curious about that.
Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |