lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 02:21:07PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Then how would you explain the 10% speed difference
> Ben and others have seen with gigabit ethernet ?

partly because of the unwakeup logic, I've no problem with it, this is
why I asked to measure how much of the 10% improvement cames from the
unwakeup/ksoftirqd-deschedule logic, I was just curious about that.

Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.096 / U:2.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site