[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Locking comment on shrink_caches()
>    Ahh, that's a cpu bug -- one my athlons don't suffer from.
> Your Athlons may handle exclusive cache line acquisition more
> efficiently (due to memory subsystem performance) but it still
> does cost something.

On an exclusive line on Athlon a lock cycle is near enough free, its
just an ordering constraint. Since the line is in E state no other bus
master can hold a copy in cache so the atomicity is there. Ditto for newer
Intel processors
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.099 / U:0.764 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site