Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 26 Sep 2001 21:27:44 +0200 (CEST) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: System hangs during interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() under 2.4.9 |
| |
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Russell King wrote:
> > printk("<%d>", irq);
> Hmm, isn't <0>, <1> etc used to encode the printk level in the string > though?
yes. the above will still be printed, because there is no newline in the printk. The first printk (which is very likely <0>), will be interpreted as KERN_EMERG and will be snipped, the rest of the 'line' will be printed. (until something printk's a \n, when the whole thing starts again.) But you are right, it's more consistent and safer to use eg. "(%d)".
Ingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |