Messages in this thread |  | | From | "William Scott Lockwood III" <> | Subject | Re: all files are executable in vfat | Date | Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:31:01 -0500 |
| |
I'm sorry, I should have been more specific - should we have a dmask option? So we could give the sysadmin/user the choice...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Nerijus Baliunas" <nerijus@users.sourceforge.net> To: "William Scott Lockwood III" <thatlinuxguy@hotmail.com>; <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "Alexander Viro" <viro@math.psu.edu> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:25 PM Subject: Re: all files are executable in vfat
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:19:09 -0500 William Scott Lockwood III <thatlinuxguy@hotmail.com> wrote: > > WSLI> dmask? > WSLI> > WSLI> ----- Original Message ----- > WSLI> > I too used noexec to get around this problem. Is there anyway to get umask > WSLI> > to ignore directories? I.E. (v)fat should always leave directories > WSLI> executable > WSLI> > in my opinion? > > There is no such option in man and using it did not help. > > > Regards, > Nerijus > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |