[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux-2.4.10 + ext3
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 08:45:22PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> So yes, it would be nice if an ext3-only kernel could drive ext2
> filesystems, but not super-important.


> As for the other part of your suggestion: make ext2 "obsolete":
> I don't think so. ext3 is wickedly complex, and ext2 is the
> reference filesystem for Linux. It could be argued (at length) that
> the VFS and block layers were designed for, and are almost part of
> ext2.

I didn't mean to imply this. I love ext2 and still use it more than
probably any other filesystem (judging by numbers of partitions).

I simply was hoping for insted of:

<*> EXT2 fs
<*> EXT3 fs

(which is required today for most ext3-using people who want to do ext2

... there could be:

<*> EXT2 fs
<*> EXT3 journalling extensions

AFAIK this would eliminate a lot of duplicate kernel code for ext3

But anyway, I'm not saying that ext2 should be made obsolete. I only
use ext3 on one machine and I would be much more annoyed if I had to
enable ext3 on the other machines than live with my current situation
of needing both ext2 and ext3 in the kernel on this particular one.

I think you understand ;-).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.094 / U:6.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site