lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Tainting kernels for non-GPL or forced modules
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 03:33:44PM +0200, Andr? Dahlqvist wrote:
> Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> wrote:
>
> > IMHO the default should be complain and taint, even though it will
> > generate lots of newbie questions to l-k.
>
> Wasn't it those questions that this feature was meant to prevent in the
> first place?

Er, I thought the whole point of this was so that we would know if the
kernel had been 'tainted' by a non-free module that we can't debug.

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.080 / U:2.596 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site