Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 22 Sep 2001 09:00:13 -0700 | From | Tom Rini <> | Subject | Re: Tainting kernels for non-GPL or forced modules |
| |
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 03:33:44PM +0200, Andr? Dahlqvist wrote: > Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> wrote: > > > IMHO the default should be complain and taint, even though it will > > generate lots of newbie questions to l-k. > > Wasn't it those questions that this feature was meant to prevent in the > first place?
Er, I thought the whole point of this was so that we would know if the kernel had been 'tainted' by a non-free module that we can't debug.
-- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |