Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 22 Sep 2001 08:52:57 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: vfs_symlink return NULL inode |
| |
On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, David Chow wrote:
> Dear all, > > I have one question from using vfs_symlink, is it usual after I called > vfs_symlink that will return a dentry with dentry->d_inode == NULL???
vfs_symlink() returns an integer, not dentry.
> The link was sucessfully created but I receive a null inode pointer. > When creating a symlink it should also create an inode. But according to > the documentation about VFS from Richard, the symlink call of > inode_operations, should self call d_instantiate() this also means it > should automatically create an inode pointer. This shouldn't be done by > the caller???? Any hints? the vfs_create works fine and return with a > proper inode number, why vfs_symlink doesn't? Thanks.
No, it doesn't. vfs_create() returns 0 in case of success and small negative number in case of error. Neither has any relation to inode numbers.
dentry you've passed to it is modified - it gets non-NULL ->d_inode _if_ operation succeeded. Which is not guaranteed - depends on kind of filesystem, length of symlink body, permissions, etc.
So unless you tell what you are passing to vfs_symlink(), what does it return, etc. - there's nothing anyone could do. We might be smart, by I'm not aware of anybody here being telepathic.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |