lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool
From
Date
On Sat, 2001-09-22 at 17:09, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> Yes, I do like I've posted in all the related threads.
>
> Here is some more input for you. I hope it could help nail it down.
>
> Regards,
> Dieter
>
> BTW I'll now switching to 2.4.10-pre14
>
> SunWave1#time tar xIf /Pakete/Linux/linux-2.4.9.tar.bz2
> 34.570u 5.350s 0:47.84 83.4% 0+0k 0+0io 295pf+0w
>
> I "hear" some have disk activities (disk trashing).
>
> SunWave1#sync
>
> Runs for ages!!!

It has to flush that whole tar job you just did, which it did in memory
:)

> User CPU 0%
> System CPU 0%
> Idle CPU 99%
>
> So where did it wait???
>
> Here comes what latencytimes show:
>
> Worst 20 latency times of 5061 measured in this period.
> usec cause mask start line/file address end line/file
> 322263 reacqBKL 1 1375/sched.c c01138b4 697/sched.c
> 216174 BKL 1 30/inode.c c016b971 52/inode.c
> 158328 BKL 9 742/block_dev.c c0144d51 697/sched.c

OK, these three are not acceptable...adding them to the "list".

--
Robert M. Love
rml at ufl.edu
rml at tech9.net

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.115 / U:21.676 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site