Messages in this thread |  | | From | Roger Larsson <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool | Date | Fri, 21 Sep 2001 04:08:14 +0200 |
| |
Continuing to follow up to myself...
> > > > Hmm.. > > > > The yield we do in __alloc_pages is it really correct? > > 1. Suppose it is not we that are the problem. > > 2. Suppose there are lots of other processes that gets to run. > > 3. If kswapd had higher prio, it would start to run without us giving > > up... > > > > I have to try... > > They were already gone in -pre12! > But I was running -pre10... > Others? > Dieter is running -pre12... > I will test it anyways... >
Unexpected result, but interesting. Things got MUCH WORSE! >From nearly no problem to hardly enjoyable. (pre10 with preemptive kernel but no schedule in __alloc_pages, actual if statement removed) Maybe it is closer to what Dieter gets...
/RogerL
-- Roger Larsson Skellefteå Sweden - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |