This message generated a parse failure. Raw output follows here. Please use 'back' to navigate. From devnull@lkml.org Tue Sep 26 14:30:43 2023 Received: from spaans.ds9a.nl (adsl-xs4all.ds9a.nl [213.84.159.51]) by kylie.puddingonline.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8IEioX09520 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 16:44:50 +0200 Received: (qmail 31877 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2002 06:53:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO spaans.ds9a.nl) (3ffe:8280:10:360:202:44ff:fe2a:a1dd) by mayo.ipv6.ds9a.nl with SMTP; 18 Sep 2002 06:53:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 9032 invoked by uid 1000); 17 Sep 2002 20:28:50 -0000 Received: (maildatabase); juh Received: (qmail 17400 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2001 21:45:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 17397 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2001 21:45:10 -0000 Received: from vvtp.tn.tudelft.nl (HELO vvtp.nl) (qmailr@130.161.252.29) by spaans-smp.ds9a.tudelft.nl with SMTP; 20 Sep 2001 21:45:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 17159 invoked by uid 2547); 20 Sep 2001 21:44:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 17029 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2001 21:44:58 -0000 Received: from vger.kernel.org (199.183.24.194) by vvtp.tn.tudelft.nl with SMTP; 20 Sep 2001 21:44:58 -0000 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:42:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:42:49 -0400 Received: from lilly.ping.de ([62.72.90.2]:31506 "HELO lilly.ping.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:42:30 -0400 Received: (qmail 14648 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2001 21:42:53 -0000 Received: (ofmipd 62.72.93.100); 20 Sep 2001 21:42:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 2106 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Sep 2001 21:42:11 -0000 Date: 20 Sep 2001 23:42:11 +0200 Message-Id: <20010920234211.B2059@planetzork.spacenet> From: jogi@planetzork.ping.de To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Performance of 2.4.10-pre12aa1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hello, I forgot to CC linux-kernel so here comes my performance measurements (make -j50 bzImage modules) which show that 2.4.10-pre12aa1 is faster than 2.4.9-ac12 and way faster than 2.4.10-pre10. Regards, Jogi -- Well, yeah ... I suppose there's no point in getting greedy, is there? << Calvin & Hobbes >> --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:18:15 +0200 To: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Performance of 2.4.10-pre12aa1 Message-ID: <20010920141815.A8193@planetzork.spacenet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i Hello Andrea, I did some kernel compiling test (make -j50 bzImage modules) and 2.4.10-pre12aa1 is clearly the fastest kernel on my system: 2.4.10-pre12aa1: Command being timed: "sh -c make dep clean>logfile-2.4.10-pre12aa1-1000985915 2>&1 && make -j50 bzImage modules>>logfile-2.4.10-pre12aa1-1000985915 2>&1" User time (seconds): 271.15 System time (seconds): 22.80 Percent of CPU this job got: 85% Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 5:43.77 Major (requiring I/O) page faults: 1219007 Minor (reclaiming a frame) page faults: 1068599 2.4.9-ac12: Command being timed: "sh -c make dep clean>logfile-2.4.9-ac12-1000986647 2>&1 && make -j50 bzImage modules>>logfile-2.4.9-ac12-1000986647 2>&1" User time (seconds): 264.49 System time (seconds): 24.53 Percent of CPU this job got: 79% Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 6:05.27 Major (requiring I/O) page faults: 1196824 Minor (reclaiming a frame) page faults: 1155328 2.4.10-pre10: Command being timed: "sh -c make dep clean>logfile-2.4.10-pre10-1000987167 2>&1 && make -j50 bzImage modules>>logfile-2.4.10-pre10-1000987167 2>&1" User time (seconds): 265.81 System time (seconds): 24.04 Percent of CPU this job got: 54% Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 8:55.74 Major (requiring I/O) page faults: 1221867 Minor (reclaiming a frame) page faults: 1171864 Although 2.4.9-ac12 is not that far behind. I think the skipping is caused by some reiserfs problems which show more if your vm changes are applied. Regards, Jogi -- Well, yeah ... I suppose there's no point in getting greedy, is there? << Calvin & Hobbes >> --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/