lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fix register_sysrq() in 2.4.9++
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> u> +
> > +static inline int register_sysrq_key(int key, struct sysrq_key_op *op_p)
> > +{
> > + return -1;
> > +}
>
> make it report ok as other non compiled in stuff does - then you can avoid
> masses of ifdefs

Yeah, I considered that, and it doesn't matter to me whether it
reports 0 or -1, but it's the data pointer that (mostly) requires
the #ifdefs, unless the data is always present or a dummy data pointer
is used.... ?

~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.302 / U:3.900 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site