[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] /dev/epoll update ...

On 20-Sep-2001 Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:43:57PM -0500, Christopher K. St. John wrote:
>> Sorry, bad editing, that should be:
>> Assume a large but bursty current of low bandwidth
>> high latency connections instead of a continuous steady
>> flood of high bandwidth low latency connections.
> Isn't asynchronous io a better model for that case?

The advantage /dev/epoll has compared to aio_* and RTsig is
1) multiple event delivery/system call
2) less user<->kernel memory moves

The concept is very similar anyway coz you basically have to initiate the
io-call and wait for an event.
The difference is how events are collected.

- Davide

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.086 / U:1.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site