[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Deadlock on the mm->mmap_sem
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 08:19:09PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> > if we go generic then I strongly recommend my version of the generic
> > semaphores is _much_ faster (and cleaner) than this one (it even
> allows
> > more than 2^31 concurrent readers on 64 bit archs ;).
> >
> Andrea,
> implementing recursive semaphores is trivial, but do you have any idea
> how to fix the latency problem?

yes, one solution to the latency problem without writing the
ugly code would be simply to add a per-process counter to pass to a
modified rwsem api, then to hide the trickery in a mm_down_read macro.
such way it will be recursive _and_ fair.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.084 / U:1.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site