[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Deadlock on the mm->mmap_sem
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 12:25:40AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Andrea Arcangeli <> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 07:26:33PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > > > if we go generic then I strongly recommend my version of the generic
> > > > semaphores is _much_ faster (and cleaner) than this one
> > >
> > > Not so:-) Your patch, Andrea, grabs the spinlock far more than is necessary.
> >
> > then why your microbenchmarks says my version is much faster?
> They don't:

ok, so I drop my objections, you must have changed something radical
since the last time I benchmarked your generic rwsemaphores, I must have
missed you did those changes, sorry, so I'll just drop my rwsem patch
and I'll apply yours.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03    [W:0.046 / U:0.768 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site